3.11.2025

"Is College Worth the Cost? A Growing Debate"

WASHINGTON (AP) — For a generation of young Americans, choosing where to go to college — or whether to go at all — has become a complex calculation of costs and benefits that often revolves around a single question: Is the degree worth its price? Public confidence in higher education has plummeted in recent years amid high tuition prices, skyrocketing student loans and a dismal job market — plus ideological concerns from conservatives

For a generation of young Americans, the decision of where to attend college or whether to pursue higher education at all has become increasingly complex, often centered around the crucial question of whether a degree is worth its financial cost. Recent years have seen a significant decline in public confidence in higher education, attributed to soaring tuition fees, mounting student debt, and a challenging job market. Additionally, ideological reservations from conservative circles have compounded the issue, prompting colleges to re-evaluate and demonstrate their value to prospective students.

The notion of "return on investment" (ROI) has gained traction in college marketing, with institutions highlighting the financial advantages that come with obtaining a degree. Various new rankings assess campuses based on the economic benefits they provide. Furthermore, states like Colorado have begun publishing annual reports concerning the financial returns of college education, while Texas has incorporated these metrics into its funding calculations for community colleges.

Despite concerns, research indicates that a bachelor's degree typically offers a favorable return over time. A recent analysis by the Strada Education Foundation reveals that approximately 70% of recent public university graduates can expect to outperform a typical high school graduate financially within ten years. However, the percentages vary significantly by state, with rates as low as 53% in North Dakota and as high as 82% in Washington, D.C. States with more affordable higher education options report better outcomes.

The financial burden of college tuition is increasingly a concern for families. Emilia Mattucci, a high school counselor from East Allegheny schools near Pittsburgh, observes that many students hailing from low-income families are hesitant to incur substantial debt. Instead, a growing number choose technical schools or trades over traditional four-year universities. Mattucci explains that many families are opting out of higher education due to affordability issues and the long-term prospect of debt repayment.

U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has also expressed the need for a reevaluation of educational pathways, advocating for career preparation programs that afford students immediate post-high school employment opportunities. She asserts that while college is valuable, it is not the only route to success.

Colleges are now focusing on addressing both sides of the ROI equation—tuition costs and graduate earnings—as they contend with dwindling enrollments caused by declining birth rates. Many institutions have kept tuition rates stable in response to affordability concerns, while numerous private colleges have reduced their published prices to better reflect the net costs after financial aid.

One of the challenges remains ensuring that graduates secure well-paying jobs post-graduation. A recent gathering of college presidents revealed that public distrust stems partially from the perception that colleges are not equipping students with the necessary skills for the workforce. Michigan State University President Kevin Guskiewicz is actively working to bridge this gap by collaborating with local business leaders to identify essential skills and adjust degree programs accordingly. The aim is to ensure that students gain valuable internship experiences leading to job placements.

The disconnect between college education and job market demands has been an ongoing issue in the U.S. A study by the Burning Glass Institute indicated that 52% of recent graduates were employed in positions that did not require college degrees, even in fields with high demand, such as nursing and education. In response, the federal government has been attempting reforms for years to ensure meaningful employment outcomes for graduates. A new bipartisan bill requires colleges to meet certain earnings standards to qualify for federal funding, reinforcing the idea that degrees should result in higher earnings compared to non-degree holders.

Transparency concerning graduate outcomes is considered a critical aspect of resolving these concerns. The introduction of the College Scorecard in 2015 marked a shift toward providing data about graduate earnings by degree program. Recent bipartisan efforts seek to ensure the availability of even more comprehensive data on job placement and salaries for degree holders across various disciplines.

In North Carolina, a state-mandated study on the financial returns of degrees from public universities found that 93% produced a positive return, enabling graduates to expect higher lifetime earnings than their non-collegiate counterparts. This data is now publicly accessible, illustrating that degrees in applied mathematics and business generally yield high returns, while those in psychology and foreign languages may not.

Colleges are gradually recognizing the importance of providing this information to students and their families, particularly amid uncertain economic times. Lee Roberts, the Chancellor of UNC-Chapel Hill, emphasized the responsibility of institutions to present prospective students with clear data regarding job outlooks and earning potentials in order to facilitate informed decision-making about education paths.