PARIS (AP) — Donald Trump recently commented on the allure of the Palace of Versailles, stating, “Versailles is not gold leaf — Versailles is the real deal.” This sentiment was shared by French President Emmanuel Macron, who welcomed Trump to the historic site for a private reception, show, and dinner celebrating America’s 250th birthday.

The gathering at Versailles comes at a critical juncture for the trans-Atlantic alliance, as ongoing issues regarding Iran, Ukraine, and tariffs continue to create friction between the United States and France. Macron hopes that the charm of Versailles may facilitate personal dialogue amid these complex subjects. In fact, Trump has previously altered his plans to leave a Group of Seven summit early due to invitations to dinner, showcasing the persuasive power of such lavish receptions.

Macron recognizes that the grand setting of Versailles represents a significant soft-power asset, enabling him to blend contemporary political discussions with the historical prestige of France. He likens this approach to soccer, emphasizing his aim to score diplomatic achievements while ensuring a gracious welcome for his guests.

As France possesses limited economic and military influence over the United States, leveraging the grandeur of its cultural heritage becomes a practical diplomatic tool. Macron’s personal approach to diplomacy has been fortified by carefully orchestrated meetings in opulent settings, including his first encounter with Trump in 2017 that featured a handshake symbolizing their competitive relationship. Subsequent meetings at extravagant venues like the Eiffel Tower further emphasized the importance of context in diplomatic interactions.

Versailles adds layers of significance to the encounter between Macron and Trump, a building steeped in history that can amplify modern discussions. This venue’s historical weight serves Macron's agenda as he utilizes it to impress his American counterpart, emphasizing both the architectural beauty and the symbolic resonance of the Hall of Mirrors.

France has a long-standing tradition of hosting foreign dignitaries at Versailles, which has been a prominent diplomatic venue for over three centuries. In 2017, Macron also hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin at the palace and later King Charles III and Queen Camilla. With Trump, the occasion holds special significance due to his appreciation for architecture as a demonstration of power and success; he has even drawn inspiration from Versailles for his own venues like Mar-a-Lago.

The evening’s itinerary reportedly includes visits to the Hall of Mirrors and a spectacular fountain display, though full details were not disclosed. The Hall of Mirrors is notable for its 357 mirrors set within stunning arches, designed historically to showcase French craftsmanship and ingenuity, a characteristic that aligns well with Trump’s predilection for impressive visual representations.

Trump’s interactions often emphasize spectacle, as demonstrated by his admiration for France’s military parades and the grand presentations he has experienced during his travels. France’s diplomatic pageantry, such as the extravagant welcome in Britain that included mounted troops and a royal banquet, tends to appeal to Trump’s appreciation for grandeur, although these displays have often resulted in limited tangible outcomes in terms of policy alignment.

As Macron and Trump continue to navigate their complex relationship, characterized by both camaraderie and contention, the dinner at Versailles serves as a reminder of the power of symbolism in diplomacy. However, skepticism remains as critics in France question the necessity of such engagements with Trump amid ongoing global challenges and disagreements between the two nations.

In summary, Versailles presents a unique opportunity for Macron to bridge divides with Trump, utilizing its historical and cultural significance to their diplomatic advantage. Yet, while pageantry may temporarily ease tensions, the pre-existing policy disputes remain unresolved, echoing the lessons of past interactions between the two leaders.