6.06.2025

"Reporter Fired After Criticizing Defense Secretary"

Assigned to cover the Pentagon for the conservative outlet One America News Network, Gabrielle Cuccia didn’t pretend to be an unbiased reporter

Assigned to cover the Pentagon for the conservative outlet One America News Network (OAN), Gabrielle Cuccia openly embraced her identity as a supporter of President Donald Trump, labeling herself as "a MAGA girl." However, her outspoken criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth led to her swift dismissal from the network.

Cuccia expressed her displeasure with Hegseth's new regulations, which restricted reporters' access to the Pentagon. In a Substack post titled "The Secretary of Defense-ive," she condemned the limitations imposed in the name of national security, arguing that such restrictions were an overreach. Her comments highlighted her belief that the Pentagon was mischaracterizing how journalists operate, emphasizing that security protocols were in place and leaks originated from within Hegseth's own team, not from journalists.

In her post, Cuccia also criticized Hegseth's failure to hold a media briefing at the Pentagon, questioning why the Secretary of Defense would not embrace inquiries from the press, including challenging questions. Cuccia's access to the Pentagon was revoked three days after her Substack publication, and she reported losing her job at OAN shortly thereafter. While a Defense official stated that the Department of Defense did not terminate Cuccia's credentials, OAN declined to provide details about her dismissal.

In her statements, Cuccia argued for accountability and transparency from government officials, asserting that reporters should not face repercussions for asking tough questions about government actions. This situation reflects a broader trend in which certain media outlets, particularly those aligned with the MAGA movement, may tolerate dissenting views but only to a degree. Tom Rosenstiel, a journalism professor, pointed out that while legacy news organizations typically discourage expressing opinions about covered subjects, exceptions exist when it involves media access issues.

Cuccia’s experience also raises questions about loyalty within conservative media circles. OAN has publicly aligned itself with Trump and has faced legal challenges for promoting unfounded claims regarding the 2020 election. Additionally, Cuccia noted that her position at OAN came with privileges particularly extended to friendly outlets, marking a contrast to the treatment of traditional news organizations.

The Pentagon Press Association condemned Hegseth's restrictions as detrimental to press freedom. Cuccia’s reflections about the early MAGA movement underscore a shifting perception among Trump supporters towards dissent, suggesting that questioning leadership is often deemed as a lack of loyalty. Her critique of this trend illustrates an internal conflict within the MAGA community regarding the boundaries of acceptable criticism.

Ultimately, Cuccia's situation serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of dissent within political media environments, particularly those that prioritize allegiance to specific political figures over journalistic integrity. As the relationship between media outlets and governmental entities continues to evolve, the ramifications of holding dissenting views in partisan media will remain a topic of concern for both journalists and the public.