MONTREAL — A judicial rights organization, Droits collectifs Québec, has raised significant concerns regarding the recent appointment of Judge Robert Leckey to the Quebec Superior Court, claiming that the appointment violates legal and constitutional standards. The group argues that Leckey does not fulfill the fundamental eligibility criteria required for such a judicial position.

According to federal legislation, an individual must possess at least 10 years of experience as a member of their respective provincial bar association to qualify for a superior court judge role. However, Droits collectifs Québec asserts that Leckey, who previously served as the Dean of McGill University’s Faculty of Law, had only completed seven years in the Quebec Bar at the time of his appointment this January. This discrepancy positions his appointment as problematic under the current legal framework.

The organization has taken formal action by filing a motion in the Quebec Superior Court to contest Leckey's appointment legally. They assert that adhering to the established eligibility requirements is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and upholding public confidence in the judicial appointment process.

The Canadian Press has sought a statement from Canada's Justice Department regarding the situation but has not received an immediate response. The implications of this case may have broader effects on judicial standards and appointments across Canada, as it raises questions about compliance with legal requirements governing the accession to judicial roles.

This report, initially published on September 14, 2025, underscores the ongoing debates within the Canadian legal system regarding the selection and appointment of judges and the need for transparent adherence to established legal guidelines.